Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Retiring Number Four
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 246279" data-attributes="member: 1429"><p>I think the organization should put an asterisc at the side of his number. Because even if he tries to make ammends, to me it'll all be BS. But as someone said in this forum (sorry for not naming, don't remember), he represents much more than a player or a number. He represents the post-Lombardi 1st (till now) SB. He represents the rebirth of an organization. (I'm not saying he did it by himself, nor that he was the major reason, because that isn't true). So his number should be retired as a statement to that. Him as a person should never have his number retired. And he as a player wasn't to the standards of his myth (he was during a time spam). But what he represents (or represented, depending on the point of view) deserves that place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackersRS, post: 246279, member: 1429"] I think the organization should put an asterisc at the side of his number. Because even if he tries to make ammends, to me it'll all be BS. But as someone said in this forum (sorry for not naming, don't remember), he represents much more than a player or a number. He represents the post-Lombardi 1st (till now) SB. He represents the rebirth of an organization. (I'm not saying he did it by himself, nor that he was the major reason, because that isn't true). So his number should be retired as a statement to that. Him as a person should never have his number retired. And he as a player wasn't to the standards of his myth (he was during a time spam). But what he represents (or represented, depending on the point of view) deserves that place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
Azpackfan4
DoURant
ThePerfectBeard
Schultz
Half Empty
Fat Dogs
scheeler
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: tynimiller
1 minute ago
Draft Talk
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
2 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Heyjoe4
15 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Heyjoe4
17 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 2nd Rd pick #45 Edgerrin Cooper LB
Latest: Schultz
37 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Retiring Number Four
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top