Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Please TED why are you destroying our team

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by Fantasy~Freak*4*Life, Apr 30, 2006.

    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,917
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,778 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    40 yard dash for Jackson 4.35....Jennings 4.48

    But Jennings had better 3 cone and shuttle times then Jackson.

    On paper seems like Jennings has the better ablity to cut and run..Which will help him to get off line faster if being pressed..Which in turn should help him be a deep threat as well..

    Or am I wrong in thinking this?
  1. GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,249
    Location:
    the Northpole
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Why do we need a deepthreat when we aren't going to play many deep routes?

    You have completely misunderstood the nature of the west coast offense.
  2. GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,249
    Location:
    the Northpole
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    [IMG]

    This is the kind of plays we will be playing, if we use receivers that doesn't run accurate routes the passes will more than often be picked off. Chad Jackson is not an accurate routerunner and doesn't fit in our system, Greg Jennings is a sharpe routerunner and fits in our system.

    Also a west coast offense relies on the WR to pick up yards after the catch to make a big play, Jennings is good after the catch.
  3. Obi1 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,110
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Gakk,
    EVERYONE needs a deep threat to make the opposing defensive backs and safeties play the deep ball. THAT opens up the middle for the slants that go for the BIG gains.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,917
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,778 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    40 yard dash for Jackson 4.35....Jennings 4.48

    But Jennings had better 3 cone and shuttle times then Jackson.

    On paper seems like Jennings has the better ablity to cut and run..Which will help him to get off line faster if being pressed..Which in turn should help him be a deep threat as well..

    Or am I wrong in thinking this?
  4. P@ck66 Banned

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,207
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -1
    Exactly Packmast..i mean OB1..

    You took the words right out of my mouth...

    (That's what Terry Glenn was supposed to be for but SherRossley nearly got him killed running short, over the middle routes..which is not his thing...)

    If you don't have a guy who can stretch the defense..they don't have to worry about the deep threat and can "cheat up" to cover the crossing routes...
  5. GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,249
    Location:
    the Northpole
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    hmm let's see, the Steelers won the Superbowl without any particular deep threat in the Randy Moss, Terrell Owens mould. The Patriots seem to do fine...
  6. CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,486
    Location:
    Citrus Heights CA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    On a predraft television show done by a Las Vegas handicapper, he said that Jackson stutter steps prior to his cuts. Unless that is coached out of him it will negate any speed advantage as NFL corners know when the cut is coming.

    Mel had Jennings #4 on his WR board.

    In Green Bay he is likely the #5 receiver now until he can prove worthy to move up. With Boerigter and Gardner on 1 year deals he could become #2 next year.

    Ferguson's days are numbered. The longest numbered is final cuts of 2007.
  7. Obi1 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 4, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,110
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    So did the Packers of 96 & 97... Would you consider Freeman a deep threat? How about Rison?

    They DID have Beebe but he wasn't used that much and his longest passply was a 85 yard catch and run where he caught the pass on a short slant and ran 80 yards Vs. the Vikings.

    However, he, Rison and even Keith Jackson were used as deep pattern runners to open up the short passing game.
  8. P@ck66 Banned

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,207
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -1
    The Patriots had Branch..and Glenn who can fly..and Pittsburgh has Hines Ward..who has a knack for getting behind people...
  9. GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,249
    Location:
    the Northpole
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Jennings is almost as fast as Chad Jackson, but he makes better cuts and runs much more precise routes.

    We don't need to spend such a high pick on a player that isn't going to play that much, and only is there to stretch the defense, what are you thinking?

    This isn't the same crappy system Sherman ran, the system where Sherman got obsessed with speed and forgot all about the weather and fieldconditions...
  10. PPierce Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 10, 2005
    Message Count:
    94
    Location:
    mid-Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    He's "retarded." That pretty much says, "I am 13." We did great.
  11. GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,249
    Location:
    the Northpole
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Chad Jackson you mean?
  12. Bobby Roberts Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Message Count:
    770
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    GB still has Driver, Ferguson and Boerigter to stretch the field, and Jennings has plenty of experience scoring TDs. His best attribute is YAC, which is just what we need in the WCO!!

    It's very likely that Jennings would have been one of the top WR prospects (or the top) had he gone to a big school. Instead he went to W MI and therefore didn't get the publicity that other WRs got. That doesn't mean he's not as good or better than Jackson.
  13. GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,249
    Location:
    the Northpole
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Exactly.

    Also Chad Jackson sucks at running routes and wouldn't fit. Seems like many of you don't understand the importance of good routerunning in our system, it is everything. Greg Jennings is a good routerunner, Chad Jackson sucks at it.
  14. Fantasy~Freak*4*Life Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Message Count:
    43
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0



    Chad Jackson- 40 Speed: 4.42*

    Greg Jennings- 40 Speed: 4.54*

    [IMG]
  15. Bobby Roberts Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 14, 2005
    Message Count:
    770
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    In the end, I'm almost as happy with the Jennings pick as with us getting Hodge. I think Hodge is the steal of the draft, but I never though Jennings would have lasted that long either. The only knock in my mind is his size, but he's a similar size to Driver, who just happens to clearly be our best WR.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,917
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,778 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    mine is from the combine times listed on the NFL site

    http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/9370926

    1 Chad Jackson Florida 6-0 7/8 213 4.35

    Greg Jennings Western Michigan 5-11 1/8 197 4.48

    60-yard shuttle
    Greg Jennings Western Michigan 11.15
    Chad Jackson Florida 11.19

    3 cone
    Jennings Western Michigan 6.68
    Chad Jackson Florida 6.73



    that is why I keep saying maybe Jennings is better suited to get open if pressed at the line...On paper seems like he has some more cutting ability..
  16. GakkofNorway Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jan 30, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,249
    Location:
    the Northpole
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    jennings has better deep speed.
  17. Fantasy~Freak*4*Life Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Message Count:
    43
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0


    Mine is from the NFL.com also:
    http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/2006/jackson_chad
    http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/2006/jennings_greg

    [IMG]
  18. WinnipegPackFan Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Sep 22, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,943
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    I like your Sig Freak Dude :

    "The game of life is a lot like football. You tackle your problems, block your fears, and score your points when you get the opportunity."
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,917
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,778 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
  19. CaliforniaCheez Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Apr 13, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,486
    Location:
    Citrus Heights CA
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    If you want measurables Jennings was faster in the 3 cone drill and the shuttle run where change of direction is required.

    Don't get too caught up on measurables.

    The Biletnikoff award given to the best college receiver went to Mike Hass of Oregon St. He was drafted by the Saints in the 6th round. He will be a suprise to many. He ran a 4.6 but can do many one handed circus type catches.
  20. Fantasy~Freak*4*Life Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Feb 27, 2006
    Message Count:
    43
    Location:
    Wisconsin
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Thanks bud,

    [IMG]
  21. porky88 Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Mar 10, 2006
    Message Count:
    3,991
    Location:
    Title Town
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    Just like to add those were not their combine times. Both ran much faster 40's. that link you posted was estimates posted long before the Draft of guys taking part in the combine.

    At the combine Jackson ran a 4.35 and Jennings running a 4.48... Jackson might be faster and more explosive but Jennings is more polished.

Share This Page