Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Need to Hit in This Draft
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BorderRivals.com" data-source="post: 497153" data-attributes="member: 6416"><p>Most people agree with that sentiment by reacting to FA. Notice that bleacher report's basis for ranking the Seahawks so high was the addition of Avril, Bennett, and Winfield - yet, fails to mention that they lost Clemmons, who is much better than either of those DE's. Here's another way to think about those defensive signings - did Cliff Avril ever scare you when the Packers played them? And he was protected by Suh, Vander Boesch, and Fairly. He's just the "big-name" DE in FA, so most assume it's a huge upgrade for them.</p><p> </p><p>Plus, I have little respect for Bleacher Report. It's an entity that got where it is by SEO tactics and driving up website hits by creating these annoying and worthless slideshows. The content and analysis is bare in my opinion. And I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one that has that opinion of BR (not to insinuate that you're wrong for citing them for your main proposition b/c BR isn't alone in that assessment).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BorderRivals.com, post: 497153, member: 6416"] Most people agree with that sentiment by reacting to FA. Notice that bleacher report's basis for ranking the Seahawks so high was the addition of Avril, Bennett, and Winfield - yet, fails to mention that they lost Clemmons, who is much better than either of those DE's. Here's another way to think about those defensive signings - did Cliff Avril ever scare you when the Packers played them? And he was protected by Suh, Vander Boesch, and Fairly. He's just the "big-name" DE in FA, so most assume it's a huge upgrade for them. Plus, I have little respect for Bleacher Report. It's an entity that got where it is by SEO tactics and driving up website hits by creating these annoying and worthless slideshows. The content and analysis is bare in my opinion. And I'm pretty sure I'm not the only one that has that opinion of BR (not to insinuate that you're wrong for citing them for your main proposition b/c BR isn't alone in that assessment). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
ThePerfectBeard
Heyjoe4
shockerx
weeds
sschind
Latest posts
H
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Heyjoe4
1 minute ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
162-0
Latest: weeds
7 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Green Bay to Host '25 Draft!
Latest: weeds
13 minutes ago
NFL Discussions
S
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Schultz
Today at 5:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:58 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Packers Need to Hit in This Draft
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top