Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
lockout/decertfication
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="SpartaChris" data-source="post: 362416" data-attributes="member: 1007"><p>Why? Why should the players be allowed to micromanage the owners? That's complete and utter nonsense and ********. </p><p></p><p>What the players were being offered in terms of financial statements was MORE THAN FAIR. They were being offered audited proof that teams were losing money. They were also being offered information not even shared amongst themselves. </p><p></p><p>Also, why in the bloody hell do they need 10 YEARS worth of financials? Shouldn't the financials dating back to 2006, when the last CBA was agreed to, suffice? If not, why not? </p><p></p><p>I'm sorry, but the players are being absolutely unreasonable in their request of information. What they're being offered, simplified or not, is more than fair, especially since it will be audited information. The problem is they want to micromanage things, which they have no business doing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="SpartaChris, post: 362416, member: 1007"] Why? Why should the players be allowed to micromanage the owners? That's complete and utter nonsense and ********. What the players were being offered in terms of financial statements was MORE THAN FAIR. They were being offered audited proof that teams were losing money. They were also being offered information not even shared amongst themselves. Also, why in the bloody hell do they need 10 YEARS worth of financials? Shouldn't the financials dating back to 2006, when the last CBA was agreed to, suffice? If not, why not? I'm sorry, but the players are being absolutely unreasonable in their request of information. What they're being offered, simplified or not, is more than fair, especially since it will be audited information. The problem is they want to micromanage things, which they have no business doing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Krabs
Heyjoe4
Zad Fnark
milani
sschind
childerm
PackerDNA
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: milani
7 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Dantés
8 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Heyjoe4
12 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: sschind
22 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: tynimiller
48 minutes ago
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
lockout/decertfication
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top