Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
James jones instead of Jennings?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jordyruns" data-source="post: 470602" data-attributes="member: 3538"><p>Could not agree more with the last two posts. I personally believe we should try and sign Jones to another 2 or 3 year contract at about the same price after his runs out in 2013, this is assume we do not sign Jennings. At that point Jones will be 32 or so the perfect time to let most receivers go before there is a drastic drop off in productivity. If we do not resign him Cobb Nelson and Boykin would not be enough. Boykin is IMO could turn into a solid 4 receiver on a Packers team that prides itself with receiver talent.</p><p> </p><p>Looking towards the 2013 draft I feel that it should be a priority of TT to get both a WR and a TE by the 3rd or 4th round. Another top TE would allow us to replace Finley after one more year, and another WR would allow us to keep the receiving corp deep and talented through 4 or 5 depending on how Boykin develops for another 3 or 4 years down the road.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jordyruns, post: 470602, member: 3538"] Could not agree more with the last two posts. I personally believe we should try and sign Jones to another 2 or 3 year contract at about the same price after his runs out in 2013, this is assume we do not sign Jennings. At that point Jones will be 32 or so the perfect time to let most receivers go before there is a drastic drop off in productivity. If we do not resign him Cobb Nelson and Boykin would not be enough. Boykin is IMO could turn into a solid 4 receiver on a Packers team that prides itself with receiver talent. Looking towards the 2013 draft I feel that it should be a priority of TT to get both a WR and a TE by the 3rd or 4th round. Another top TE would allow us to replace Finley after one more year, and another WR would allow us to keep the receiving corp deep and talented through 4 or 5 depending on how Boykin develops for another 3 or 4 years down the road. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
What's life really like in Green Bay?
Latest: King of Jeans
32 minutes ago
The Green Bay Life
2024 Round 7, pick 255 (compensatory): Kalen King, CB
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 4:05 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: Sunshinepacker
Today at 3:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 1:46 PM
Draft Talk
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 1:06 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
James jones instead of Jennings?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top