H
HardRightEdge
Guest
Another unfortunate circumstance. Looks like Green and/or Starks gets a reprieve, or Pease goes to PS.
He was injured in OTAs and then reinjured it on Friday night.Did he get injured during a pre-season game?
Wait, what?#%&? Wholly conspiracy theories Batman. Your logic makes zero sense. The NFL has talked about keeping the game count at 20 no matter what, it's just whether they move from 16 reg / 4 pre-season to 18 reg / 2 pre-season.Yet, players now technically play a 20 game season. (4 pre. 16 reg.) And if they do play 18 reg. season games, then pre-season may be cut down to 2 or it stays at 4.
So players would be playing 20-24 games which, still, wouldn't prevent injuries and the NFL is being two faced while claiming to try and prevent injuries.
Are we sure that the American government is not running the NFL?
Thank you for the answer.He was injured in OTAs and then reinjured it on Friday night.
Wait, what?#%&? Wholly conspiracy theories Batman. Your logic makes zero sense. The NFL has talked about keeping the game count at 20 no matter what, it's just whether they move from 16 reg / 4 pre-season to 18 reg / 2 pre-season.
My point (Which I admit was hard to get across in the colorful way I tried to express it) is that the NFL claims they want to prevent injuries while at the same time they are keeping it at a high game count.
Keep it at 16 reg.
Reduce the pre-season to 2 (Or not at all) and there could be less injuries.
The NFL, to me, looks hypocritical.
Look at Lacy, was a stud in college, behind an o line that could probably start for most pro teams. Then look at him against the Seahawks. Run to daylight, that's a RB's job... if there's no daylight, what do you expect?? (Having GH as your starting QB doesn't help... who's going to respect that passing game?)
Did he get injured during a pre-season game?
If so, let me see if I get this.
So the NFL which fines a player for even just looking at another player the wrong way will get fined to try and crack down on preventing injuries is mulling about the idea to expand the season by two more games. Which could result in more injuries.
Yet, players now technically play a 20 game season. (4 pre. 16 reg.)
And if they do play 18 reg. season games, then pre-season may be cut down to 2 or it stays at 4.
So players would be playing 20-24 games which, still, wouldn't prevent injuries and the NFL is being two faced while claiming to try and prevent injuries.
Are we sure that the American government is not running the NFL?
The NFL has terminated discussions with the union on the 18 game season, which would have included a 2 game preseason. It is dead.
The NFL has a new initiative...studying leg injuries. I suggest they begin with the Packers, with particular attention to this DD GrassMaster turf.
Another one bites the dust...I feel bad because this kid needed to get back in there for his career to take off.
I have a section on my whiteboard for IRed players, I will sadly add him to the list...two starters lost and we haven't even played a real game yet. What is the deal in Green Bay with this number of injuries every single year?
Are we sure that the American government is not running the NFL?
FF-
If the American government were running the NFL...
1. There would only be two teams.
2. Both would suck.