Welcome to Green Bay Packers NFL Football Forum & Community!
Packer Forum is one of the largest online communities for the Green Bay Packers.

You are currently viewing our community forums as a guest user. Sign up or
Having an account grants you additional privileges, such as creating and participating in discussions.

Favre Interview at end of the game.

Discussion in 'Packer Fan Forum' started by PackerLegend, Jan 1, 2007.

  1. Zero2Cool Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 11, 2004
    Message Count:
    11,901
    Location:
    Green Bay, WI
    Ratings Received:
    +5 / 1 / -0
    Packer Fan Since:
    1989
    He has lost some arm strength and accuracy. Does that mean he is worse than any other option the Packers have? No.

    He gives the Packers the best chance to win and to attract FA. Just my opinion.
  2. P@ck66 Banned

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,207
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -1
    My point was that he really hasn't "lost" arm strength and accuracy....

    I think it's a fallacy....
  3. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    of course you do
  4. P@ck66 Banned

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,207
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -1
    As do many other Packer "fans", NFL people like Troy Aikman, Phil Simms, and Steve Young, and many, many other people in the business who know....

    (except for a small, misguided, fringe contingent of Packer "fans" for some unknown reason.)
  5. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    Troy Aikman, Phil Simms, Steve Young, and those people don't watch every Packers game.
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,924
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    From the 90's to today is his arm strength the same?

    It might have went from a 100 mph fast ball to a 92

    And if thats the case big deal??

    I think what Aikman, Young and the rest mean is that he still has a powerfull arm and CAN bring the heat...

    as far as being accurate?

    2006 was his lowest comp percentage..

    Does that mean its slipping? maybe, or maybe that the wr dropped to many balls too..but it is interesting..
  6. wpr Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,517
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    P@ck I understand how you and others may feel that way and it doesn't bother me.
    Personally I don't think he has lost anything as far as accuracy goes but I don't see how a 37 yr old man is going to have the exact same arm strength as a 25-28 yr old man. I know pros are atypical and the normal rules of an aging body don't apply to them. Nevertheless, I have seen him underthrow his receivers when they are in a fly pattern down the sideline a lot more often in the past couple of years than he did in years 3-7. Some of the thime no doubt it is a communication problem between him and the receiver, the wind and weather are factors other times. Pressure from the defense and his OL's ability to give him time and room to throw also contributes as well. But at least a little bit of it has to be attributed to his arm. (And as I said I think it is more than just a little bit.)
  7. P@ck66 Banned

    Member Since:
    Jun 5, 2005
    Message Count:
    2,207
    Ratings Received:
    +1 / 0 / -1
    I should have he said.."He hasn't lost much arm strength"...

    Perhaps some..(but not so much that it really matters anyway), as some people would have you believe.....(that was my point..)
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,924
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    I think everyone would agree with that
  8. tromadz Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 15, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,000
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +3 / 0 / -0
    what P@ck66 says and means are often different, so its hard to understand.
  9. wpr Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,517
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    You know maybe the discussion shouldn't be how much strength has Brett lost but how much does he still have? If he still has a 92 MPH fast ball that's still pretty good as long as he doesn't think it isa 100 one.
    He threw some bullets on the slant passes over the middle in the Chicago game. I prefer him to go to the short and middle routes.
  10. wpr Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,517
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    oh good I am out of my yellow period. I wonder what I did to make my post look like that?
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,924
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    maybe edit the post ??
  11. wpr Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Jun 3, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,517
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    yeah I went back to edit it and I still had probelems with it so I am just going to ignore it and it will go away as soon as this thread dies out.

    After al I should be working and not editing a post anyway. :rotflmao:
    • Super Moderator

    longtimefan Super Moderator

    Member Since:
    Mar 6, 2005
    Message Count:
    13,924
    Location:
    Milwaukee
    Ratings Received:
    +1,780 / 50 / -5
    Packer Fan Since:
    1975
    No edit this one, its the last post before the frames got all wierd..maybe edit the font style or something, or the color?


    My point was that he really hasn't "lost" arm strength and accuracy....

    I think it's a fallacy....

    P@ck I understand how you and others may feel that way and it doesn't bother me.
  12. warhawk Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Dec 7, 2005
    Message Count:
    1,922
    Location:
    Gulf Shores, Al
    Ratings Received:
    +38 / 0 / -0
    What Favre brings as far as understanding what's going on across the line when he is under center far outways any arm strengh issues. He's not asked to throw 20+ yard sideline passes anymore in this offense anyhow.

    When he has to let it go between coverages he can get it there as fast as anyone out there.

    He does miss a few more a game than he used to but he see's what's going on with the defense and knows what to call as well as anyone in the game.

    As far as the interview goes Favre see's the end and knows he's going to miss it regardless of if that's this year or next.

    Too me it's like bringing up a lost loved one and the reality of it is emotional for him regardless of when it actually happens. What I see when this happens is a guy who wishes more than anything in his heart of hearts that he was 30 years old again and it's hard for him to go there.
  13. umair Cheesehead

    Member Since:
    Aug 12, 2006
    Message Count:
    923
    Location:
    chicago
    Ratings Received:
    +0 / 0 / -0
    favre has lost alittle bit of accuracy and power but i dont think its as bad as we think it is.

    favre really only has one good recivers and the other recivers are rookies or just can catch the ball. their have been many times when balls where their where dropped passes(one of the reasons our red zone o is not good).

    give favre at least one more good reciver and i guarantee his numbers will be alot better(comp %, and tds).

Share This Page