Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
erm not sure what to title this
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ceodore" data-source="post: 519615" data-attributes="member: 5438"><p>It was my impression that the whole issued stemmed from making a decision on Rodgers. The time had come during that offseason where the Pack needed to commit to AR otherwise he was going to go elsewhere. Brett had "retired" (was that for the second or 3rd time at that point?) so the Pack's decision was made for them in going with Rodgers. Then of course Brett wanted to play again but I think the organization was a little tired of being given the back and forth at that point. I think Brett took that a little personally.</p><p> </p><p>I personally didn't have a problem with him playing for the Jets or even the Vikings, they had a pretty decent team at the time and Brett probably saw that as an opportunity for a super bowl run. I liked what I saw of AR and had grown tired of all the INT's from BF.</p><p> </p><p>I think the Pack made the right decision in letting him go. It wasn't fair to AR to be promised the reigns of the team only to shove him aside because Brett wanted to unretire again. Especially what we know now of AR's mentality and chip on his shoulder, I think he'd be gone if they had brought BF back that year.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ceodore, post: 519615, member: 5438"] It was my impression that the whole issued stemmed from making a decision on Rodgers. The time had come during that offseason where the Pack needed to commit to AR otherwise he was going to go elsewhere. Brett had "retired" (was that for the second or 3rd time at that point?) so the Pack's decision was made for them in going with Rodgers. Then of course Brett wanted to play again but I think the organization was a little tired of being given the back and forth at that point. I think Brett took that a little personally. I personally didn't have a problem with him playing for the Jets or even the Vikings, they had a pretty decent team at the time and Brett probably saw that as an opportunity for a super bowl run. I liked what I saw of AR and had grown tired of all the INT's from BF. I think the Pack made the right decision in letting him go. It wasn't fair to AR to be promised the reigns of the team only to shove him aside because Brett wanted to unretire again. Especially what we know now of AR's mentality and chip on his shoulder, I think he'd be gone if they had brought BF back that year. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Fat Dogs
gopkrs
Latest posts
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: Thirteen Below
17 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: gopkrs
26 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 255 (compensatory): Kalen King, CB
Latest: Dantés
53 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 6, pick 202: Travis Glover, OT
Latest: Dantés
Today at 10:35 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 10:35 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
erm not sure what to title this
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top