Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
zero defense equals zero chance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Arkaign" data-source="post: 686652" data-attributes="member: 12010"><p>Dallas and GB are my teams, but I'm able to follow Dallas much more closely being from TX. </p><p></p><p>I do think Romo will come back in this year. He seems to always have one rusty game or half game before getting into form, but there are no guarantees when you get to the mid 30s in age, and when the dropoff comes it's stunning (eg; 2014 Peyton vs 2015 Peyton). </p><p></p><p>The more educated football analysts seem to know that Dak is extremely impressive for a rookie, but still a rookie regardless. Pressure doesn't seem to get to him all that much, but he REALLY put up a bad couple of quarters vs. the Eagles. While it's true that Philly has one of the best defensive fronts in the NFL (maybe THE best when Logan is in), that's no excuse for how absolutely terribly Dak played in the middle of that game. </p><p></p><p>Dak has some positives : </p><p></p><p>Tough, can run, doesn't pull the ball down and deer-in-headlights run either, but likes to escape AND still find a receiver. </p><p></p><p>But some negatives : </p><p></p><p>Needs more polish on fundamentals and throwing motion. Hasn't shown elite deep ball accuracy (and in the Philly game, his accuracy mid-game was abominably bad). </p><p></p><p>If Romo was in 2014 form or 90%, that's a better NFL QB in the league today. Dak was an absolute steal in the late 4th round, and started way better than almost any other rookie QB I can think of, but I think he still needs some experience to get to the next level. At least he shows an immense work ethic. </p><p></p><p>--------------</p><p></p><p>For GB, I think they take the division to be quite honest. The Vikings were an absolute mirage, they have one of the worst offenses I've seen in years. It's not even really Bradford's fault really. Bradford behind the Dallas O line would probably be putting up better numbers than Dak. But that Vikings O line is complete garbage, and a non-mobile QB with no RB threat (or even RB capable of dependably picking up the blitz), well .. they have no chance of playing .500 through the rest of the season. An offense that keeps going 3 and out WILL eventually crush their defense under the weight of fatigue, injury, and despair.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Arkaign, post: 686652, member: 12010"] Dallas and GB are my teams, but I'm able to follow Dallas much more closely being from TX. I do think Romo will come back in this year. He seems to always have one rusty game or half game before getting into form, but there are no guarantees when you get to the mid 30s in age, and when the dropoff comes it's stunning (eg; 2014 Peyton vs 2015 Peyton). The more educated football analysts seem to know that Dak is extremely impressive for a rookie, but still a rookie regardless. Pressure doesn't seem to get to him all that much, but he REALLY put up a bad couple of quarters vs. the Eagles. While it's true that Philly has one of the best defensive fronts in the NFL (maybe THE best when Logan is in), that's no excuse for how absolutely terribly Dak played in the middle of that game. Dak has some positives : Tough, can run, doesn't pull the ball down and deer-in-headlights run either, but likes to escape AND still find a receiver. But some negatives : Needs more polish on fundamentals and throwing motion. Hasn't shown elite deep ball accuracy (and in the Philly game, his accuracy mid-game was abominably bad). If Romo was in 2014 form or 90%, that's a better NFL QB in the league today. Dak was an absolute steal in the late 4th round, and started way better than almost any other rookie QB I can think of, but I think he still needs some experience to get to the next level. At least he shows an immense work ethic. -------------- For GB, I think they take the division to be quite honest. The Vikings were an absolute mirage, they have one of the worst offenses I've seen in years. It's not even really Bradford's fault really. Bradford behind the Dallas O line would probably be putting up better numbers than Dak. But that Vikings O line is complete garbage, and a non-mobile QB with no RB threat (or even RB capable of dependably picking up the blitz), well .. they have no chance of playing .500 through the rest of the season. An offense that keeps going 3 and out WILL eventually crush their defense under the weight of fatigue, injury, and despair. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Thirteen Below
37 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: AKCheese
Today at 12:51 AM
Draft Talk
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: AKCheese
Today at 12:44 AM
Draft Talk
Most hated teams outside of the division
Latest: milani
Today at 12:23 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:11 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
zero defense equals zero chance
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top