Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Worth reading: MM's and TT's future, possible GM candidates
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Guapo" data-source="post: 557113" data-attributes="member: 5830"><p>If you choose to only focus on one sentence in a post and not the entire post, well then, I guess that's where we are at now. At least I know.</p><p></p><p>For the record, I'm not redefining a thing. I said from the start and still believe that a backup QB was a mid-round need in 2005, not a priority like safety was in this year's draft. Your spitting out marbles from your mouth.</p><p></p><p>...and also for the record, what Brandt wrote (pasted below since your memory seems to be ailing) does not refute one thing that I said. He said that they trusted the board. It doesn't refute that they had a need for a backup QB, but I'm sure you're going to find a way to defend yourself and explain how. It said that they had a first round need for defense, which I also agree with.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Guapo, post: 557113, member: 5830"] If you choose to only focus on one sentence in a post and not the entire post, well then, I guess that's where we are at now. At least I know. For the record, I'm not redefining a thing. I said from the start and still believe that a backup QB was a mid-round need in 2005, not a priority like safety was in this year's draft. Your spitting out marbles from your mouth. ...and also for the record, what Brandt wrote (pasted below since your memory seems to be ailing) does not refute one thing that I said. He said that they trusted the board. It doesn't refute that they had a need for a backup QB, but I'm sure you're going to find a way to defend yourself and explain how. It said that they had a first round need for defense, which I also agree with. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Members online
gatorpack
GreenBaySlacker
Azpackfan4
edensmage
Schultz
ExpatPacker
tynimiller
weeds
rmontro
scheeler
Packermudgeon
PikeBadger
txj
coulomb
Fat Dogs
Latest posts
G
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
A moment ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: PikeBadger
Today at 1:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: weeds
Today at 1:27 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 1:25 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 12:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Worth reading: MM's and TT's future, possible GM candidates
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top