Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="El Guapo" data-source="post: 557113" data-attributes="member: 5830">If you choose to only focus on one sentence in a post and not the entire post, well then, I guess that's where we are at now. At least I know.For the record, I'm not redefining a thing. I said from the start and still believe that a backup QB was a mid-round need in 2005, not a priority like safety was in this year's draft. Your spitting out marbles from your mouth....and also for the record, what Brandt wrote (pasted below since your memory seems to be ailing) does not refute one thing that I said. He said that they trusted the board. It doesn't refute that they had a need for a backup QB, but I'm sure you're going to find a way to defend yourself and explain how. It said that they had a first round need for defense, which I also agree with.</blockquote>

Total: 191 (members: 3, guests: 188)