Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Carl 2" data-source="post: 743366" data-attributes="member: 12630">A factor than many fans don't consider when talking about how the team looks without Rodgers is that the team would be hugely different if he wasn't around.A poster once said imagine the Chiefs roster with Rodgers, which was impossible due to the salary cap and way oversimplified.  First, they'd have $20 million worth of other talent on the team. Maybe that's a defensive stud or two. Secondly, he automatically lowers our draft position by giving us wins.  Finally, if Rodgers wasn't around, I guarantee a 5th round pick wouldn't be our current starter. It could be a Dak Prescott or Russel Wilson. Odds are, the starter would be better than Hundley. Maybe the team would have been awful and picked Cam Newton number one. Who knows?  Of course, the team is still better with with Rodgers, but if the Packers never had him, the team would be much different. And likely better than the current team led by Hundley.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 74 (members: 0, guests: 74)