Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wide Receiver Options
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 978268" data-attributes="member: 10086"><p>I mean It’s ok. There’s 2 schools of thought here.</p><p>One is we’ve got a newer stable of Receivers and a massive new Reord breaking $ commitment, including some QB say on player acquisitions that affect his Offense. All these changes require maximum effort on all parties to gel. Several WR showed that commitment as an example Romeo Doubs was a good example of said commitment</p><p></p><p>The second school was business as usual. #12 will compensate for everyone else’s shortcomings, after all he’s back to back MVP. What could he or anyone else possibly benefit. It’s more or less a waste of time. </p><p></p><p>Personally I don’t care about other teams, their scenarios at WR were a far cry from ours. Also had #12 made 1 group text every WR on that team would’ve showed up. Those other guys got wind that it’s not important because their Captain said so. I believe level of commitment is silent but obvious. In this case obviously the Packers don’t need the extra 10 days…right? NOT!!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="OldSchool101, post: 978268, member: 10086"] I mean It’s ok. There’s 2 schools of thought here. One is we’ve got a newer stable of Receivers and a massive new Reord breaking $ commitment, including some QB say on player acquisitions that affect his Offense. All these changes require maximum effort on all parties to gel. Several WR showed that commitment as an example Romeo Doubs was a good example of said commitment The second school was business as usual. #12 will compensate for everyone else’s shortcomings, after all he’s back to back MVP. What could he or anyone else possibly benefit. It’s more or less a waste of time. Personally I don’t care about other teams, their scenarios at WR were a far cry from ours. Also had #12 made 1 group text every WR on that team would’ve showed up. Those other guys got wind that it’s not important because their Captain said so. I believe level of commitment is silent but obvious. In this case obviously the Packers don’t need the extra 10 days…right? NOT!! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DoURant
tynimiller
GBkrzygrl
Heyjoe4
Latest posts
2024 Salary Cap as related to Free Agency
Latest: tynimiller
6 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: DoURant
9 minutes ago
Draft Talk
S
The 11th Annual Amish Draft Contest 2024
Latest: scheeler
18 minutes ago
Draft Talk
S
2024 Draft-- Media Stuff
Latest: Schultz
45 minutes ago
Draft Talk
H
Trade Up Targets
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:45 AM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Wide Receiver Options
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top