Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 953312" data-attributes="member: 10086">There are many paths to fixing our gap at WR.The most obvious to follow the path of surrounding Rodgers with his regular stable f/2021. That said, I’ll just note that even though I’m not personally a huge fan of MVS due to notable limitations.  The argument for him is strong… continuity.MVS has been in this system the longest and without Adams he likely gets an increase in snaps. It doesn’t mean we are near set with the departure of our star #1. Yet MVS gives us a viable option to start tomorrow, plus Rodgers knows himSo these are just some examples of our draft firepower. If neededTrading a #22 snd #53 gets us near #13 overall.l (Likely a first WR off the board)Trading just our #22 and our 3rd rounder gets us in #18 conversation (#1-#2 best WR)I like the idea of using a 3rd or 4th rounder in a trade up if needed to land our guy. I’d even consider compromising. Holding our #22 for a DEFENDER Then using our natural #28 and packaging a 3rd rounder (maybe getting a 4-5th in return)That’s last scenario puts us in solid contention at that #23-#24 range (likely a top #2-3 WR).Whatever the final scenario. We clearly have the potential of selecting from the best 3 WR out of college if desired. Any of those guys would be pushing for a top depth chart spot early.</blockquote>

Total: 110 (members: 3, guests: 107)