Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why the Packers can't be active in free agency
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BorderRivals.com" data-source="post: 438206" data-attributes="member: 6416"><p>Fair points. As for Clifton and DD, if (hopefully when) they cut them, the Pack will free up about $10M in cap space. And you are right in that the Packers can be involved in free agency. I fully expect they will be to a limited extent. But, they cannot be active in pursuing free agents. As TT typically does, he will let the market set the right price, and jump when the price adjusts to a fair value and one that won't cripple the Pack going forward, knowing full well that he has some important signings coming up. I think the latter part gets lost when free agency starts and is important to keep in mind when discussing the Packers chances of getting Wimbley for example.</p><p> </p><p>I agree with you, too, that it would be good to grab a veteran center and draft a successor (although not rd. 1). Someone to keep an eye out for is that Samson Steele kid from Oak. He's young and anchored a top rushing unit these last few years. I have no clue about his pass-pro (obv.). And yes I know about his recent arrest. If anything, though, that could drive down his price for the Packers to get him on a bargain.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BorderRivals.com, post: 438206, member: 6416"] Fair points. As for Clifton and DD, if (hopefully when) they cut them, the Pack will free up about $10M in cap space. And you are right in that the Packers can be involved in free agency. I fully expect they will be to a limited extent. But, they cannot be active in pursuing free agents. As TT typically does, he will let the market set the right price, and jump when the price adjusts to a fair value and one that won't cripple the Pack going forward, knowing full well that he has some important signings coming up. I think the latter part gets lost when free agency starts and is important to keep in mind when discussing the Packers chances of getting Wimbley for example. I agree with you, too, that it would be good to grab a veteran center and draft a successor (although not rd. 1). Someone to keep an eye out for is that Samson Steele kid from Oak. He's young and anchored a top rushing unit these last few years. I have no clue about his pass-pro (obv.). And yes I know about his recent arrest. If anything, though, that could drive down his price for the Packers to get him on a bargain. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Green_Bay_Packers
Latest posts
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: milani
Today at 3:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
Today at 12:29 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Cornelius Weems
Today at 12:05 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 7:46 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: weeds
Yesterday at 6:52 PM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why the Packers can't be active in free agency
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top