Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why no Starks?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="brandon2348" data-source="post: 573198" data-attributes="member: 7094"><p>They cant run because there mostly lining up out of the "three receiver set" in "hurry up offense" and not changing formations or personnel too much during drives. That and the the "running plays" there running out of it suck and don't benefit the "make up" of our offensive line or Lacy's talents. Sometimes to gain an advantage somewhere you lose an advantage somewhere else.</p><p></p><p>IMO Starks is better suited for the way there running the offense as far as running the ball but like others have posted he isn't as good a pass blocker and then the substitution thing. In fact, Dejuan Harris might be better suited with the way MM has this offense set up.</p><p></p><p>Last year Flynn or Tolzien were in there so we loaded up more with blockers in the box and pounded Lacy. It was more true "smash mouth".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="brandon2348, post: 573198, member: 7094"] They cant run because there mostly lining up out of the "three receiver set" in "hurry up offense" and not changing formations or personnel too much during drives. That and the the "running plays" there running out of it suck and don't benefit the "make up" of our offensive line or Lacy's talents. Sometimes to gain an advantage somewhere you lose an advantage somewhere else. IMO Starks is better suited for the way there running the offense as far as running the ball but like others have posted he isn't as good a pass blocker and then the substitution thing. In fact, Dejuan Harris might be better suited with the way MM has this offense set up. Last year Flynn or Tolzien were in there so we loaded up more with blockers in the box and pounded Lacy. It was more true "smash mouth". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Cornelius Weems
Latest posts
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
21 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 8:08 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:59 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 7:44 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 7:40 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why no Starks?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top