Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why Lacy's second cough up wasn't a fumble.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Daryl Muellenberg" data-source="post: 590200" data-attributes="member: 9708"><p>I assume that is just your opinion. Did you read the rule? The rule states that play is dead (runner is down) in that case. Here it is again: Rule 7, Section 2, Article 1-f: "An official shall declare the ball dead and the down ended: when an opponent takes a ball that is in the possession of a runner who is on the ground."</p><p></p><p>It specifically says the play is dead when an opponent takes a ball that is in the possession of a runner who is on the ground. It doesn't say that the player has to be touched first. So going by the letter of the rule, the play is dead the way I read it. I do agree that it should be a fumble, but again, that's not the way the rule is written.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Daryl Muellenberg, post: 590200, member: 9708"] I assume that is just your opinion. Did you read the rule? The rule states that play is dead (runner is down) in that case. Here it is again: Rule 7, Section 2, Article 1-f: "An official shall declare the ball dead and the down ended: when an opponent takes a ball that is in the possession of a runner who is on the ground." It specifically says the play is dead when an opponent takes a ball that is in the possession of a runner who is on the ground. It doesn't say that the player has to be touched first. So going by the letter of the rule, the play is dead the way I read it. I do agree that it should be a fumble, but again, that's not the way the rule is written. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Magooch
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:46 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 9:23 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Josh Jacobs facing charges…
Latest: rmontro
Today at 9:07 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: tynimiller
Today at 8:51 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Today at 8:27 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why Lacy's second cough up wasn't a fumble.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top