Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 508888" data-attributes="member: 4300">On the contrary PackFanNChiTown I think the irony of the timing of the first five posts on this thread is telling and humorous: February 2010 … let’s see … what was in store for the Packers in the upcoming season? Considering the motive for resurrecting this thread <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/biggrin.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":D" title="Big Grin    :D" data-shortname=":D" />We’ve been over this a lot and IMO we fans just don’t know enough to assign blame regarding the failings of the OL. Aside from McCarthy’s keeping him on, the candidates are Campen’s coaching of the OL, Thompson’s acquisition of talent for the OL, McCarthy’s decision to install the ZBS and sticking with it, and bad luck with injuries (and I say bad luck because while Thompson can be blamed for drafting injury-prone Justin Harrell, the same can’t be said for Sherrod or Bulaga). Thinking replacing Campen fixes all the problems IMO is simplistic and unrealistic.  No, you can “only” describe a switch like that in-season as an act of desperation. Doing it in the spring considering McCarthy’s options at LT can be described as common sense. For example I would have really liked to see this OL this season: Bulaga, Sitton, EDS, Lang, Bakhtiari.</blockquote>

Total: 341 (members: 2, guests: 339)