Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 885284" data-attributes="member: 7261">So here is a shocker for you, the Packers 5 loses have come with Adams playing.  Pattern?Fact is, the Packers are 19-5 under MLF.  Many of those 19 wins were actually close games, without Adams, who knows how many they would have lost.  4 out of the 5 losses were ugly blowout losses where the Packers were just mostly terrible on offense (and defense).  If you are saying had Adams not played yesterday, in the 2 games against the 49ers or the 1 game against the Chargers and the Packers would have won all 5 of those games, then I am listening.  Otherwise, I see a Pattern of a good team beating inferior teams, even without their #1 WR on the field.The Packers have a really good offensive minded head coach IMO, as well as a FHOF QB, a top 5 WR and RB and a decent offensive line.  Their record last season with basically the same players was indictive of a team that on any given Sunday, should beat all but the top tier teams.  Saying "oh look they won 6 games without Adams" would mean a lot more to me if the Packers were 12-12 over the last 2 seasons.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 419 (members: 0, guests: 419)