Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PackersRS" data-source="post: 383889" data-attributes="member: 1429">There's only one thing about that article. It only takes into account stats. And even so, he's comparing Rodgers' 3 years as a QB to the entire career of Manning, Brady...Rodgers has only been elite since last year. The years prior, he was amazing, but he was not elite. Manning and Brady have 7 years of elite play to base their stats on.And even so, it doesn't take into account if Rodgers was responsible for the comeback losses or not. Sure, it does separate with drives where Rodgers had the chance of doing so, and Rodgers' stats greatly improve.But it still doesn't show if his receivers dropped the ball, if the line broke down, or if Rodgers simly didn't make the plays... And it doesn't show a per year basis, as I'm pretty sure Rodgers' situational stats last year and in 09 were much better than in 08, and I expect them to be even better this year.I understand and agree with the article, Rodgers isn't as good in a comeback as Manning, Brady... But he's usually better in the rest of the time. Rarely he puts his team in a bad situation to lose.How many games has Rodgers costed us? I honestly can't remember a single one that he played bad enough to cost us a game. I sure remember Manning and Brady sucking so bad they costed their teams a W.But, yeah... It's just too early to compare careers at this point.</blockquote>

Total: 323 (members: 3, guests: 320)