Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Who would you rather we draft at #21?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sunshinepacker" data-source="post: 548366" data-attributes="member: 9033"><p>Now, I wouldn't be in favor of this but if we DID trade up to the second pick I'd actually be happier drafting Khalil Mack than Clowney (which is good since I still think Clowney goes #1). Football Outsiders does something called SackSEER which is supposed to estimate the number of sacks a player is capable of in their first five years in the NFL and their model actually projects Mack as the better pass rusher. Clowney is only 15lbs heavier and while he ran the 40 0.1 seconds faster, Mack absolutely CRUSHED Clowney in the three-cone drill (basically 0.2 seconds faster) and also beat Clowney in vertical leap and broad jump. The only negative about Mack is his quality of competition but that didn't hurt Demarcus Ware too much.</p><p></p><p>Just an fyi, Football Outsiders' SackSEER would actually prefer Mack over Peppers and Jevon Kearse when they came out of college (those two used to be the first and second ranked players in SackSEER's history).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sunshinepacker, post: 548366, member: 9033"] Now, I wouldn't be in favor of this but if we DID trade up to the second pick I'd actually be happier drafting Khalil Mack than Clowney (which is good since I still think Clowney goes #1). Football Outsiders does something called SackSEER which is supposed to estimate the number of sacks a player is capable of in their first five years in the NFL and their model actually projects Mack as the better pass rusher. Clowney is only 15lbs heavier and while he ran the 40 0.1 seconds faster, Mack absolutely CRUSHED Clowney in the three-cone drill (basically 0.2 seconds faster) and also beat Clowney in vertical leap and broad jump. The only negative about Mack is his quality of competition but that didn't hurt Demarcus Ware too much. Just an fyi, Football Outsiders' SackSEER would actually prefer Mack over Peppers and Jevon Kearse when they came out of college (those two used to be the first and second ranked players in SackSEER's history). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
tynimiller
Magooch
shockerx
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
11 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: rmontro
Today at 11:33 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 11:04 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 11:03 AM
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:46 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Who would you rather we draft at #21?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top