Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Whitney Mercilus
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 926091" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Here's how I see it.</p><p></p><p>Rodgers turns 38 this year. Whether he would work it out to stay in Green Bay or not, his time as the Packers' starter is drawing to a close. </p><p></p><p>After this year, the focus should be on the transition to a new QB. </p><p></p><p>If the Packers can trade Rodgers for a haul of draft capital, it puts them in position to either:</p><p></p><p>a) Build around Love with lots of premium talent.</p><p></p><p>b) Go get another QB if Love ain't the guy.</p><p></p><p>Not many franchises get the chance to move on to a really talented 1st round QB who has been groomed for two seasons <em>along with </em>a nice float of assets from trading the last guy. That's an ideal situation for transitioning, in my mind. It's more attractive than hanging onto Rodgers for a couple more declining seasons. </p><p></p><p>On Adams, I would be fine if they worked out a deal with him and kept him around for Love, but I just generally don't love the idea of paying a WR elite money. I don't think the positional value is worth it. I'd rather spend on the OL, DL, ED, CB, etc. So if they could tag and trade and get a nice pick back, I think I'd do it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 926091, member: 12283"] Here's how I see it. Rodgers turns 38 this year. Whether he would work it out to stay in Green Bay or not, his time as the Packers' starter is drawing to a close. After this year, the focus should be on the transition to a new QB. If the Packers can trade Rodgers for a haul of draft capital, it puts them in position to either: a) Build around Love with lots of premium talent. b) Go get another QB if Love ain't the guy. Not many franchises get the chance to move on to a really talented 1st round QB who has been groomed for two seasons [I]along with [/I]a nice float of assets from trading the last guy. That's an ideal situation for transitioning, in my mind. It's more attractive than hanging onto Rodgers for a couple more declining seasons. On Adams, I would be fine if they worked out a deal with him and kept him around for Love, but I just generally don't love the idea of paying a WR elite money. I don't think the positional value is worth it. I'd rather spend on the OL, DL, ED, CB, etc. So if they could tag and trade and get a nice pick back, I think I'd do it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
SudsMcBucky
Latest posts
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
38 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: mradtke66
Today at 10:49 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:44 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 7:18 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Whitney Mercilus
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top