Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Candidate for Deletion" data-source="post: 729883" data-attributes="member: 12503">Good point.  I have not looked at all to see what the average number of snaps lost (using that term) is for each team, I just wanted to demonstrate that guys upon whom we relied heavily are now no longer with us, and other guys will have to pick up those snaps and do more than they did last year with their work load.  Also, I'm fully on board the "CM3-minus-HGH=Bad" train, inasmuch as he essentially is no longer the Claymaker at all.  We pretty much lost him too.With the last year thing, I was talking about how we had high expectations for an apparently healthy and properly weighted Lacy.  Monty did great in his workload once Lacy was gone, but the expectation at the start was a returned-to-form Lacy and time for Monty to come up to speed.  This year it's a "we hope Monty's success wasn't a fluke" and a bunch of rookies.I agree that the circumstances of last year's CB disaster are unlikely to repeat themselves.  My particular worry is two fold, and pertains mostly to Randalls and Rollins.  First, that they've each only had one year of success, and there are enough of those guys who never found it again to fill in the Grand Canyon.  Second, the possibility of recurrence of injury or even that they will never fully recover from their injuries, which while smaller than the representative group of the first case, could still fill up a large building.To be clear, I actually really REALLY like our CB group this year, but they're essentially a rookie, a guy we didn't want to have to play last year (but who actually did relatively well when he did play), somebody who is essentially a castoff from another team (granted, a team which utilized him poorly as they could for reasons, I guess), and a couple of guys who got hurt after looking pretty good (intentionally overlooking Hawkins and the other developmental guys).  Again, I really like the personnel, but the history of performance is not there at all, and that is why I list them as essentially an unknown.I guess, technically speaking, they have 21/32 chances of being better than last year XDwhat's that?  not funny?  awwww</blockquote>

Verification

Members online

No members online now.

Total: 251 (members: 0, guests: 251)

Latest posts

Pick 198 Warren Brinson DT Georgia
- Latest: DoURant
- Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Draft Talk
Transfer portal and NIL Money, how they have changed college sports".
- Latest: gopkrs
- Yesterday at 2:24 PM
College Sports
H
Final Thoughts on 2025 Draft
- Latest: Heyjoe4
- Yesterday at 2:07 PM
Draft Talk
2025 Roster - Semi Live Thread
- Latest: OldSchool101
- Yesterday at 1:54 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Schedule Release
- Latest: Pokerbrat2000
- Yesterday at 12:42 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum