Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Where would you rather go for a divisional game?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Un4GivN" data-source="post: 695512" data-attributes="member: 8782"><p>Seattle for sure, Dallas is just a better team all around. I seen life from Aaron throwing against the LoB, and without Earl Thomas that defense is nothing to fear.</p><p></p><p>I think Dallas could just control the game and keep AR off the field.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Where did this illusion of AR being great on turf come from? That 2010 playoff run? AR is actually significantly worse in his career on turf.</p><p></p><p>For his career.</p><p>On Grass: 105.2 Rating 65.3 completion 4.36 TD to INT 14.96 drop backs per sack 457 drop backs per fumble</p><p></p><p>On Turf: 99.1 Rating 64.3 completion 3.1 TD to INT 10.76 drop backs per sack 115.2 drop backs per fumble</p><p></p><p>Statistically he is worse in just about every passing metric imaginable on turf. Now a lot has to do with these being away games. But I wouldn't ever say he is better on turf than grass. Just no stat supports that at all.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Un4GivN, post: 695512, member: 8782"] Seattle for sure, Dallas is just a better team all around. I seen life from Aaron throwing against the LoB, and without Earl Thomas that defense is nothing to fear. I think Dallas could just control the game and keep AR off the field. Where did this illusion of AR being great on turf come from? That 2010 playoff run? AR is actually significantly worse in his career on turf. For his career. On Grass: 105.2 Rating 65.3 completion 4.36 TD to INT 14.96 drop backs per sack 457 drop backs per fumble On Turf: 99.1 Rating 64.3 completion 3.1 TD to INT 10.76 drop backs per sack 115.2 drop backs per fumble Statistically he is worse in just about every passing metric imaginable on turf. Now a lot has to do with these being away games. But I wouldn't ever say he is better on turf than grass. Just no stat supports that at all. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:15 AM
All Other Sports
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 8:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 7:52 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Jordan Love Era Begins
Latest: AmishMafia
Yesterday at 6:36 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: DoURant
Yesterday at 5:53 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Where would you rather go for a divisional game?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top