Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 951666" data-attributes="member: 7261"><p>I fully agree with you on 2 things.....wanting Rodgers deal to be different than first reported and that sometimes what the media reports can range from 100% wrong to 100% right.  However, sometimes some information is better than no information and vice versa.  Out of the names you listed and 1000 more, I actually find Rapoport and a few Packer reporters to be right on most of the time.  I do think there is now a push for all those guys you listed to be able to claim they "broke the news".  When in reality, yes...they certainly did take news, reported it first, but when the facts all come out, they didn't have the full story, due to rushing to "break it".  If you watched the Pat M. show, he sure made a big deal out of slamming Ian R. and the fact that it was he, Pat ******* McAfee that broke the news of the trade.</p></blockquote><p></p>

No members online now.

Total: 71 (members: 0, guests: 71)