Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Where do you think we'll finish next season? (Post-Draft edits...)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deleted member 6794" data-source="post: 951644"><p>The Packers can actually get close to under the cap (they would most likely still be $500K over it) by releasing Z and sign Rodgers and Alexander to extensions. There are other moves to be made to create additional cap space without having to weaken the defense any further.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>How would we have gotten any better by trading the MVP and letting the best receiver in the game walk away???</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I think the Broncos were all-in on trading for Rodgers before having to settle on Wilson. They didn't make that call at all.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>The Packers won't have a lot of cap space to be active in free agency. Gutekunst needs to have a terrific draft.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As mentioned above, the Packers releasing Z and extend Rodgers and Alexander will take care of that.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I fully expect Rodgers' base salary in 2022 to be the veteran minimum, allowing the Packers to dave $20 million of cap space.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm convinced the Packers had a deal with the Broncos in place in case Rodgers told them he wanted to be traded.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deleted member 6794, post: 951644"] The Packers can actually get close to under the cap (they would most likely still be $500K over it) by releasing Z and sign Rodgers and Alexander to extensions. There are other moves to be made to create additional cap space without having to weaken the defense any further. How would we have gotten any better by trading the MVP and letting the best receiver in the game walk away??? I think the Broncos were all-in on trading for Rodgers before having to settle on Wilson. They didn't make that call at all. The Packers won't have a lot of cap space to be active in free agency. Gutekunst needs to have a terrific draft. As mentioned above, the Packers releasing Z and extend Rodgers and Alexander will take care of that. I fully expect Rodgers' base salary in 2022 to be the veteran minimum, allowing the Packers to dave $20 million of cap space. I'm convinced the Packers had a deal with the Broncos in place in case Rodgers told them he wanted to be traded. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:10 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Yesterday at 7:06 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 5:34 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 1:59 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 10:55 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Where do you think we'll finish next season? (Post-Draft edits...)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top