Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
What would you give up for Revis?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BorderRivals.com" data-source="post: 487462" data-attributes="member: 6416"><p>The cap impact has no doubt been discussed at length in relation to this deal. Revis would obviously demand a max deal. With him on board, Packers would be forced to cut ties with Raji because there's no way to sign Revis, Rodgers, and Matthews. This is another big reason I don't see this working for the Packers: <a href="http://wp.me/p29VCs-fO" target="_blank">http://wp.me/p29VCs-fO</a></p><p> </p><p>Don't get me wrong, straight up, everyone would take Revis over Raji. But, the Packers simply do not have anyone like Raji. If we lost Raji, Pickett would swing back to NT for his final season. Our DE's would be a combo of Neal, Worthy, Wilson, Daniels, etc. Needless to say, the line would become a major liability. And though we could try to rebuild through the draft. We've seen how it's not a sure thing - particularly without a slew of picks traded away for Revis. Bottom line, if Raji is not resigned, it wouldn't matter that we could cover every passing attack because teams would run it down our throats all game long. </p><p> </p><p>Given the depth of the secondary (with four average or better CB's), the lack of depth on the line, and cap limitations, trading for Revis just doesn't work for the Packers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BorderRivals.com, post: 487462, member: 6416"] The cap impact has no doubt been discussed at length in relation to this deal. Revis would obviously demand a max deal. With him on board, Packers would be forced to cut ties with Raji because there's no way to sign Revis, Rodgers, and Matthews. This is another big reason I don't see this working for the Packers: [url]http://wp.me/p29VCs-fO[/url] Don't get me wrong, straight up, everyone would take Revis over Raji. But, the Packers simply do not have anyone like Raji. If we lost Raji, Pickett would swing back to NT for his final season. Our DE's would be a combo of Neal, Worthy, Wilson, Daniels, etc. Needless to say, the line would become a major liability. And though we could try to rebuild through the draft. We've seen how it's not a sure thing - particularly without a slew of picks traded away for Revis. Bottom line, if Raji is not resigned, it wouldn't matter that we could cover every passing attack because teams would run it down our throats all game long. Given the depth of the secondary (with four average or better CB's), the lack of depth on the line, and cap limitations, trading for Revis just doesn't work for the Packers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
blossi
Azpackfan4
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Thirteen Below
Today at 12:58 AM
Draft Talk
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Yesterday at 10:55 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Yesterday at 10:05 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
Yesterday at 10:04 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
What would you give up for Revis?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top