Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Krabs" data-source="post: 912834" data-attributes="member: 15739"><p>Yes, but those players will actually be playing and producing for the Packers. If Rodgers isn't playing for the Packers they cannot spend that money on players on the roster. You say it is spent. Well, yes it is. On Rodgers who is playing for the Packers. Don't forget that if Rodgers is playing for someone else and we have that dead money we still have to also pay a player to take his spot. Sure, is what it is, but I'd still prefer not to set the record on having dead money on the salary cap.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Total: 624 (members: 1, guests: 623)