Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 907740" data-attributes="member: 12283">One thing that is somehow going unmentioned in a lot of this discussion: Aaron Rodgers turns 38 this year. We are a couple years away from the end of his playing career, whether it's in Green Bay or somewhere else. So yeah... ANY team gets worse if you take the reigning MVP off of it. But even if the Packers didn't choose to make that decision, it would be made for them sooner rather than later.This is why I've been saying that trading him makes a lot of sense. Most teams, when they're trying to get off the ground with a new franchise QB, have to shell out a ton of draft capital to get their guy. The Packers have an opportunity to instead acquire a ton of draft capital to use to build around their QB by trading Rodgers before he's totally done.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 44 (members: 0, guests: 44)