Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Lare" data-source="post: 152573" data-attributes="member: 114">The NFL is set up to allow for teams to improve themselves in a fairly short time. Losing teams get better draft position, easier schedules, less demands on their salary cap, etc. But all of that means nothing if someone isn't making good personnel and player evaluations & decisions.As to what's an acceptable & reasonable timeframe for that to happen, that's totally in the eye of the beholder. I'm guessing some people would give TT 10-years of losing and still be pleased with his performance. Others probably aren't quite as forgiving.In my opinion, GMs shouldn't need  2,3,4 or more years to show signs of improvement if they are truly good talent evaluators and good at doing their jobs, as long as they're not hampered in their actions by a meddling owner or lack of available salary cap space.As Ron Wolf showed us, when you have a good GM in a good situation, improvement is noticeable right away and significant success should be experienced in the 3rd-4th year. Only in hindsight will we see if history looks back on TT and deems him a good GM.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 103 (members: 1, guests: 102)