Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="OldSchool101" data-source="post: 863731" data-attributes="member: 10086">If there’s no other reasonable Veteran option at WR, I can see GB hitting WR twice in this draft.As others have said, This is the perfect draft to be needing a #2-#3 type wideout. They’re thick throughout. Which gives us some latitude on going after a premier Defender if a high grade guy is in earshot of #30, even moving up a few spots. We’re not pigeonholed so to speak, which is fortunate.My feelings wouldn’t be hurt if we doubled down at WR and Lazard, MVS, EQ and Kumerow were fighting for #4-#6, WR roster spots so to speak. Time to pick it up a notch.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 191 (members: 1, guests: 190)