Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Week two: Falcons blowout studs and duds.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PackAttack12" data-source="post: 737542" data-attributes="member: 11933"><p>Your attempt at being condescending was pretty cute.</p><p></p><p>Greater value to the team moving forward doesn't necessarily equate to being the best player as of the present. Even after all of those points being brought to the table, the Falcons still scorched the Packers defense just the same as it did this past January. Your point would be more valid if the argument could be made that Randall and Rollins looked considerably better last night than they did several months ago. They didn't. And they even had a better pass rush to assist them last night! Even in the Seattle game, there were multiple plays where guys got beat by the Seattle receivers. And got bailed out because the pass rush altered the throws from Russell Wilson.</p><p></p><p>There are going to be games in which the Packers defense performs quite well. The following games from last season would qualify:</p><p></p><p>Week 2 at Minnesota</p><p>Week 5 v.s. New York</p><p>Week 7 v.s. Chicago</p><p>Week 12 at Philadelphia</p><p>Week 13 v.s. Houston</p><p>Week 14 v.s. Seattle</p><p>Wild Card round v.s. New York</p><p></p><p>But when it's time to perform on the biggest stage, they have come up small (31 points to Dallas, 44 to Atlanta).</p><p></p><p>And you can challenge my intelligence all you want if that makes you feel superior, but silly me, I refuse to believe that you can essentially replace Hyde with House, which for the sake of argument lets call that a wash. You lose Gunter. And you only add rookies to a bad defense, things aren't going to be much better. And it proved to not be better last night.</p><p></p><p>But I'm supposed to believe that, because of our Week 1 performance against Seattle, that our secondary is somehow vastly improved? The same team that scored 12 points v.s. San Francisco <em>at home?? No way. </em></p><p></p><p>This team has yet to prove it can perform at a high level v.s. an elite offense and until it does, I'm going to continue being skeptical.</p><p></p><p>Again, silly me. But I'm all about results. And I currently see no results that suggest improvement. When I see results v.s. an elite offense, I'll be the first to acknowledge it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PackAttack12, post: 737542, member: 11933"] Your attempt at being condescending was pretty cute. Greater value to the team moving forward doesn't necessarily equate to being the best player as of the present. Even after all of those points being brought to the table, the Falcons still scorched the Packers defense just the same as it did this past January. Your point would be more valid if the argument could be made that Randall and Rollins looked considerably better last night than they did several months ago. They didn't. And they even had a better pass rush to assist them last night! Even in the Seattle game, there were multiple plays where guys got beat by the Seattle receivers. And got bailed out because the pass rush altered the throws from Russell Wilson. There are going to be games in which the Packers defense performs quite well. The following games from last season would qualify: Week 2 at Minnesota Week 5 v.s. New York Week 7 v.s. Chicago Week 12 at Philadelphia Week 13 v.s. Houston Week 14 v.s. Seattle Wild Card round v.s. New York But when it's time to perform on the biggest stage, they have come up small (31 points to Dallas, 44 to Atlanta). And you can challenge my intelligence all you want if that makes you feel superior, but silly me, I refuse to believe that you can essentially replace Hyde with House, which for the sake of argument lets call that a wash. You lose Gunter. And you only add rookies to a bad defense, things aren't going to be much better. And it proved to not be better last night. But I'm supposed to believe that, because of our Week 1 performance against Seattle, that our secondary is somehow vastly improved? The same team that scored 12 points v.s. San Francisco [I]at home?? No way. [/I] This team has yet to prove it can perform at a high level v.s. an elite offense and until it does, I'm going to continue being skeptical. Again, silly me. But I'm all about results. And I currently see no results that suggest improvement. When I see results v.s. an elite offense, I'll be the first to acknowledge it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
DABIGZ
Latest posts
R
Mike McCarthy Gone
Latest: rmontro
Today at 5:31 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Early 53 Man Roster Projection
Latest: OldSchool101
Today at 12:02 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2025 NFL Schedule Release
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 12:01 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Pick 87 Savion Williams WR TCU
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 11:47 PM
Draft Talk
First Round Prospect Discussions Specifically
Latest: tynimiller
Yesterday at 9:40 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Week two: Falcons blowout studs and duds.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
