Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="TJV" data-source="post: 513731" data-attributes="member: 4300">Thank goodness the Packers won’t be overlooking the Bengals as this board is – there are more posts on the Packers-Vikings thread than on this one. Maybe it was the informative OP here. <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/wink.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)" data-shortname=";)" />The Bengals have one of the deepest and most talented rosters in the league. Here are a couple of quotes from the jsonline preview of the game:  But they will have to able to run the ball so the Packers run D will get another test. My guess is CJ Wilson won’t be a healthy inactive again this week – they’ll need to keep the big guys on the DL fresh.Here’s my biggest concern for the game. The Bengals’ DL: That’s 24 sacks from two guys on their DL last season. That’s like the Packers having a prolific pass rusher opposite Matthews. The attention each gets helps the other.If the Packers OL is up to the challenge, Rodgers and his receivers will have to deal with a physical D backfield. This will be a big road test for the Packers.<a href="http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/packers-at-bengals-basics-take-five-tale-of-the-tape-b9997622z1-224169361.html" target="_blank">http://www.jsonline.com/sports/packers/packers-at-bengals-basics-take-five-tale-of-the-tape-b9997622z1-224169361.html</a></blockquote>

Total: 758 (members: 1, guests: 757)