Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="warhawk" data-source="post: 228466" data-attributes="member: 431">The difference between the Packers and the Vikings is that the Vikings don't actually "build" teams but buys them by importing a significant number of new guys every year. Team chemistry this does not create or depth does it make. This is the method the press, however, LOVES and all the guru's grasp onto this because they recognize the names that justify immediate improvement in teams. Of course, if this actually worked that great, Washington would have won the last five SB's. GB creeps along building from within and drafting good although really not spectacular names which of course totally befuddles the experts who didn't think the Pack did enough in the off-season and completely botched the draft so obviously we will suck. I have said this before about the NFL. If your not deep your dead. The teams standing in the end have guys behind guys that can come in and play.When it comes to who's standing at the end of sixteen games we have the players top to bottom to be there and from that perspective I see no other team in the North close. The opener will be a fun and interesting game. Much more so then where the division will stand by week thirteen or fourteen.</blockquote>

Total: 706 (members: 4, guests: 702)