Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 842324" data-attributes="member: 7261">I think that is the whole point.  Those "what if's" that people use to criticize the outcome of a play that has already occurred in real time, that they are looking at frame by frame and from all angles.  There are a lot of what ifs to every play, some make the play work, some make the outcome even worse.  Personally, I don't fault Rodgers at all for that play not working.  I credit a solid performance by the Bear defense and a crappy performance by the Packer OL.  "What if"....he throws that ball a bit high to Graham and its tipped to Prince A, who basically runs it up the sideline for 6?  Now we are talking about Rogers throwing a bad pass, on a play that would probably net 4 yards and how it cost the Packers the game.To expect Rodgers to have the vision and frame by frame vision at that, that some people use film for, in order to be critical of the outcome of a play doesn't work for me, especially in this example.  Pick a play where it was very obvious that a mistake was made and should have been seen on the field and real time.</blockquote>

Total: 230 (members: 2, guests: 228)