Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
We need for Clay to not be m.i.a in MIA
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ExpatPacker" data-source="post: 575863" data-attributes="member: 5535"><p>I agree to an extent. From what I read about Clay, some of this problems have been over pursuit/overrunning where he has in fact managed to force the QB out of the pocket but left a clear lane. That's not loss of mobility, it's overzealousness in trying to do too much. </p><p></p><p>As for Rodgers, I can now live much easier with his holding onto the ball for 2 reasons. First, Rodgers has developed an even quicker delivery, so if he sees someone open the ball is out of his hands. That happened against the Dolphins many times. Rodgers got hit a lot and he didn't have much time, but the pass was already away. Now look at the TD he threw to Cobb. That was a thing of pure beauty. No one was open. He held onto the ball, scrambled and showed just how much quickness he still had, and throws a strike to a wide open Cobb in the end zone. No one, not Kaeperdoink, Newton, Wilson or any other running QB could have done that, and Brady, Brees and Manning don't have that kind of mobility. Rodgers does and he uses it rather than just throwing the ball away.</p><p></p><p>Fact of the matter, it IS better to risk a sack than risk an INT. If Tannehill hadn't throw 2 picks in the 1st half, Miami probably wins that game.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ExpatPacker, post: 575863, member: 5535"] I agree to an extent. From what I read about Clay, some of this problems have been over pursuit/overrunning where he has in fact managed to force the QB out of the pocket but left a clear lane. That's not loss of mobility, it's overzealousness in trying to do too much. As for Rodgers, I can now live much easier with his holding onto the ball for 2 reasons. First, Rodgers has developed an even quicker delivery, so if he sees someone open the ball is out of his hands. That happened against the Dolphins many times. Rodgers got hit a lot and he didn't have much time, but the pass was already away. Now look at the TD he threw to Cobb. That was a thing of pure beauty. No one was open. He held onto the ball, scrambled and showed just how much quickness he still had, and throws a strike to a wide open Cobb in the end zone. No one, not Kaeperdoink, Newton, Wilson or any other running QB could have done that, and Brady, Brees and Manning don't have that kind of mobility. Rodgers does and he uses it rather than just throwing the ball away. Fact of the matter, it IS better to risk a sack than risk an INT. If Tannehill hadn't throw 2 picks in the 1st half, Miami probably wins that game. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
milani
GreenBaySlacker
Latest posts
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: OldSchool101
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
6 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: GreenBaySlacker
22 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
The Crew - 2026
Latest: milani
45 minutes ago
Milwaukee Brewers Forum
H
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 10:59 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
We need for Clay to not be m.i.a in MIA
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top