Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Was it really worth it to let Matt Flynn go?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Guapo" data-source="post: 467997" data-attributes="member: 5830"><p>Where do I start.</p><p> </p><p>First - Harrel did not trip at the goal line. Saturday got walked backwards by his opponent and tripped Harrel. Watch the replay. Flynn, Rodgers, and The Green Lantern all would have tripped. Credit Harrel for almost making the play. The one point you could make is that he should have recognized the trip and tucked the ball in for a sack.</p><p> </p><p>Second - as pointed out Flynn was not let go. He left in free agency. For the money <u>he was projected to get</u>, whom should we forgone? Like him or not, I'd rather have Jermichael Finley instead of paying that money to the backup QB. I'm pretty sure that TT was also looking ahead to needing to sign Greg Jennings, Aaron Rodgers, Clay Matthews, and a few others this coming off-season.</p><p> </p><p>Third - was what worth it? Letting a backup the rarely saw the field leave in free agency for big money. Uhhhh, yeah. Since 1992 and through the MM era, the Packers have an incredible history of developing backup QBs. Why in the world would you pay big money for a backup?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Guapo, post: 467997, member: 5830"] Where do I start. First - Harrel did not trip at the goal line. Saturday got walked backwards by his opponent and tripped Harrel. Watch the replay. Flynn, Rodgers, and The Green Lantern all would have tripped. Credit Harrel for almost making the play. The one point you could make is that he should have recognized the trip and tucked the ball in for a sack. Second - as pointed out Flynn was not let go. He left in free agency. For the money [U]he was projected to get[/U], whom should we forgone? Like him or not, I'd rather have Jermichael Finley instead of paying that money to the backup QB. I'm pretty sure that TT was also looking ahead to needing to sign Greg Jennings, Aaron Rodgers, Clay Matthews, and a few others this coming off-season. Third - was what worth it? Letting a backup the rarely saw the field leave in free agency for big money. Uhhhh, yeah. Since 1992 and through the MM era, the Packers have an incredible history of developing backup QBs. Why in the world would you pay big money for a backup? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
coulomb
Latest posts
Kentucky Derby Day!
Latest: Thirteen Below
3 minutes ago
All Other Sports
Transfer Portal and How It Has Changed College Sports
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
18 minutes ago
College Sports
C
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 2:40 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Bucks v. Pacers
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 2:24 PM
Milwaukee Bucks Forum
2024 Packer UDFA Tracker....
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 12:47 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Was it really worth it to let Matt Flynn go?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top