Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
UDFA Tracker 2022
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="tynimiller" data-source="post: 959540" data-attributes="member: 6578"><p>Okay I gotta admit Chauncey Manac missed my radar in pre-draft research and studying. I gotta highlight this dude some, he deserves it:</p><p></p><p>So first the negative....he is an older prospect after being a 6th year prospect:</p><p>2016 saw him go to Georgia as a three star recruit (KY, Tenn, A&M all recruited too) and get redshirted, deciding to transfer I suspect minimum 24 years old but couldn't find for sure anywhere.</p><p>2017 Transferred to Garden City CC for one season</p><p>2018 Transferred to Louisiana after choosing them over Cinci, Florida and Ole Miss with offers.</p><p>Four Year start for the Rajun Cajuns amassing:</p><p>2018 - 47 Tackles/4 Sacks/8.5 TFL/1 PD/1 FF</p><p>2019 - 31 Tackles/3 sacks/5.5 TFL/</p><p>2020 - 31 Tackles/2 sacks/5.5 TFL/1 INT</p><p><strong>2021 - 57 Tackles/10.5 sacks/14.5 TFL/2 PD/2 FF</strong></p><p>TOTAL - 166 Tackles/19.5 sacks/34 TFL/3 PD/3 FF/1 INT</p><p></p><p>In the 2021 season he produced 40 pressures, good for 41st in the entire draft class (only two fewer than Mafe and Ojabo)</p><p></p><p>He did not produce good athletic numbers in testing, only a 3.63 RAS type of prospect. What is odd though is his 20 yard split and his 40 are awesome 2.74 and 4.67...his first 10 however is a struggle. He isn't an explosive guy, but what is odd is if you gave me his film first I'd have bet for sure this was at minimum a 7.00 RAS type guy, and I would have expected his agility ratings to be what drug it down. </p><p></p><p>Seriously watch some of this game tape and I simply don't understand other than he simply might be a terrible performer in shorts...but put a helmet on him and a mouthpiece in and its like his "go button". Zadarius was a sub 4.0 RAS guy as well. I'm not in anyway saying Manac will be even remotely that level of player...just strengthening it that not everyone is a shorts performer.</p><p></p><p>He on film shows a solid moves package, great motor and at times I swear was vastly quicker off the line than his numbers would lead you to predict.</p><p></p><p>Watch some Manac tape and I think with the limited roster proven beyond Smith and Gary...watch out for this guy making noise for a roster bid spot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="tynimiller, post: 959540, member: 6578"] Okay I gotta admit Chauncey Manac missed my radar in pre-draft research and studying. I gotta highlight this dude some, he deserves it: So first the negative....he is an older prospect after being a 6th year prospect: 2016 saw him go to Georgia as a three star recruit (KY, Tenn, A&M all recruited too) and get redshirted, deciding to transfer I suspect minimum 24 years old but couldn't find for sure anywhere. 2017 Transferred to Garden City CC for one season 2018 Transferred to Louisiana after choosing them over Cinci, Florida and Ole Miss with offers. Four Year start for the Rajun Cajuns amassing: 2018 - 47 Tackles/4 Sacks/8.5 TFL/1 PD/1 FF 2019 - 31 Tackles/3 sacks/5.5 TFL/ 2020 - 31 Tackles/2 sacks/5.5 TFL/1 INT [B]2021 - 57 Tackles/10.5 sacks/14.5 TFL/2 PD/2 FF[/B] TOTAL - 166 Tackles/19.5 sacks/34 TFL/3 PD/3 FF/1 INT In the 2021 season he produced 40 pressures, good for 41st in the entire draft class (only two fewer than Mafe and Ojabo) He did not produce good athletic numbers in testing, only a 3.63 RAS type of prospect. What is odd though is his 20 yard split and his 40 are awesome 2.74 and 4.67...his first 10 however is a struggle. He isn't an explosive guy, but what is odd is if you gave me his film first I'd have bet for sure this was at minimum a 7.00 RAS type guy, and I would have expected his agility ratings to be what drug it down. Seriously watch some of this game tape and I simply don't understand other than he simply might be a terrible performer in shorts...but put a helmet on him and a mouthpiece in and its like his "go button". Zadarius was a sub 4.0 RAS guy as well. I'm not in anyway saying Manac will be even remotely that level of player...just strengthening it that not everyone is a shorts performer. He on film shows a solid moves package, great motor and at times I swear was vastly quicker off the line than his numbers would lead you to predict. Watch some Manac tape and I think with the limited roster proven beyond Smith and Gary...watch out for this guy making noise for a roster bid spot. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Members online
Schultz
Packermudgeon
DoURant
scheeler
GreenBaySlacker
gopkrs
PikeBadger
ExpatPacker
Firethorn1001
AKCheese
PackerDNA
Sip
Packer Fan in SD
Pkrjones
Big L
sschind
U.P. Packfan
shockerx
Team Ronny
RepStar15
PackerinSD
Latest posts
S
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Sip
1 minute ago
Draft Talk
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: longtimefan
3 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #45 Edgerrin Cooper LB
Latest: tynimiller
27 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
C
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 5:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 3:57 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
UDFA Tracker 2022
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top