Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JeffQuery" data-source="post: 256367" data-attributes="member: 574">In 2007 he had absolutely NO running game, and a terrible line, and young WR's who were just coming into their own for the first 8 games... In 2004, he had a decent line and running game, but no WR's...I think that was the year defenses double covered DD and there was no one else to really step up, couldn't get open....and SherRossley was a TERRIBLE coach. Way too predictable. Bad gametime decisions. I don't know if you're remembering things too clearly there, LT.  Now, Favre has a decent O-Line, a GREAT running back, and good WR's...That's the difference that you are seeing.  Favre doesn't have to do it himself, anymore, and carry the team on his shoulders...and you're seeing how lethal he can be with a decent team around him. I know you won't agree because you guys ALWAYS think the GB Packers have the best guys in the NFL...but in non-Homer reality, they don't.</blockquote>

Total: 211 (members: 1, guests: 210)