Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 995035" data-attributes="member: 7261">That is the one big variable that I worry about.  The powerhouses are just going to get more powerful.I guess there could be an argument that small schools might have big donors that want their alma mater to succeed in a sport.  So whatever company that alumni donor works for/owns, doles out some big NIL money to athletes willing to play there.  The problem with that logic, smaller schools get a lot less national coverage, as do their players, so the whole reason for NIL money, isn't really serving its intended purpose.The only solution I have come up with and I am sure that there are several more being thrown around, would be to put a cap on the amount of money (NIL) that a team or an individual student athlete could collect in a year.   Schools would then have to come up with their own policy as to how they can spread that "cap" among players.I guess a second and a hybrid of that would be for the NIL money to be paid to the school into a "NIL fund", all of which has to be distributed equally among all rostered players.  Put a cap on the total that a school could collect.  Some might complain about that and say that the athlete generating the NIL isn't getting it all.  Yup, but if it wasn't for that school giving that athlete a chance to play, they probably aren't being offered any NIL.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 84 (members: 0, guests: 84)