Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Trading Kampman
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pack_Attack_Is_Back" data-source="post: 252092" data-attributes="member: 1146"><p>Okay I've seen some people saying that the packers should trade Kampman, and though I see their arguments, I ask what happened to Capers' Blitzburg defense that he was supposed to implement? I truthfully think trading Kampman would be a dumb decision for a couple simple reasons:</p><p></p><p>1. Chances are, the pack won't be offered a proven veteran that is well versed in the 3-4 that could be useful this season.</p><p></p><p>2. When Kampman is a proven beast in the pass rush, and he's being stuck dropping back a minimum of 1 in 3 plays, more like 2-3 in my opinion, how can he be as effective in disrupting the pass?</p><p></p><p>I understand it's in the job description to drop into coverage in the 3-4, but come on, we were promised the successful, Blitzburg defensive scheme, and Capers hasn't been sending the pressure. We can't tell how Kampman is rushing the passer when they aren't consistently sending him. The most effective 3-4 schemes are when they rush the passer consistently and in a manner that the QB is confused where the pressure is coming from.</p><p></p><p>Nay Sayers beware, They start bringing pressure the way the 3-4 is supposed to Kampman will perform, and make you respect him again.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pack_Attack_Is_Back, post: 252092, member: 1146"] Okay I've seen some people saying that the packers should trade Kampman, and though I see their arguments, I ask what happened to Capers' Blitzburg defense that he was supposed to implement? I truthfully think trading Kampman would be a dumb decision for a couple simple reasons: 1. Chances are, the pack won't be offered a proven veteran that is well versed in the 3-4 that could be useful this season. 2. When Kampman is a proven beast in the pass rush, and he's being stuck dropping back a minimum of 1 in 3 plays, more like 2-3 in my opinion, how can he be as effective in disrupting the pass? I understand it's in the job description to drop into coverage in the 3-4, but come on, we were promised the successful, Blitzburg defensive scheme, and Capers hasn't been sending the pressure. We can't tell how Kampman is rushing the passer when they aren't consistently sending him. The most effective 3-4 schemes are when they rush the passer consistently and in a manner that the QB is confused where the pressure is coming from. Nay Sayers beware, They start bringing pressure the way the 3-4 is supposed to Kampman will perform, and make you respect him again. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
sschind
Sanguine camper
blossi
Latest posts
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Sanguine camper
5 minutes ago
Draft Talk
2024 3rd round #88 MarShawn Lloyd RB
Latest: milani
Today at 3:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
2024 3rd Rd #91 Ty’Ron Hopper LB
Latest: RicFlairoftheNFL
Today at 3:25 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Poppa San
Yesterday at 10:58 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Schultz
Yesterday at 10:41 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Trading Kampman
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top