Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Trading #14 pick
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 763215" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>He wasn't playing LT in college because when that line was set, they had tackles (Stanley, McGlinchey) and needed a guard. I assume he never moved out to tackle because he was so utterly dominant at guard. </p><p></p><p>Why can't he be considered an amazing talent at the position he already plays? Why must there be a projection of a position change for him to be considered a stellar guard prospect? </p><p></p><p>I understand the reasoning of those who argue that guard isn't valuable or necessary enough to invest in high in the draft. However, for me there comes a point at which the value of the individual player is just too good to pass on. </p><p></p><p>Would you also say that the Packers should pass on Saquon Barkley, Tremaine Edmunds, Roquan Smith, and Derwin James? Because the $ around the league would say that their positions (RB, Off-Ball Linebacker, Safety) are comparable or lesser in value compared to a guard.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 763215, member: 12283"] He wasn't playing LT in college because when that line was set, they had tackles (Stanley, McGlinchey) and needed a guard. I assume he never moved out to tackle because he was so utterly dominant at guard. Why can't he be considered an amazing talent at the position he already plays? Why must there be a projection of a position change for him to be considered a stellar guard prospect? I understand the reasoning of those who argue that guard isn't valuable or necessary enough to invest in high in the draft. However, for me there comes a point at which the value of the individual player is just too good to pass on. Would you also say that the Packers should pass on Saquon Barkley, Tremaine Edmunds, Roquan Smith, and Derwin James? Because the $ around the league would say that their positions (RB, Off-Ball Linebacker, Safety) are comparable or lesser in value compared to a guard. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
M
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Magooch
Today at 4:05 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Badgers Football 2025-2026
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 2:15 PM
Wisconsin Badgers Forum
Movies and TV shows Thread
Latest: Voyageur
Today at 1:29 PM
Movies and Entertainment
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: CarryTheG14
Today at 11:42 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 9:48 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Draft Talk
Trading #14 pick
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top