Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="mradtke66" data-source="post: 1094867" data-attributes="member: 4199">LThe problem with all of that is you are looking at game totals.  Even when healthy, neither player played 100% of the snaps.  Too much summarization, not enough detail.  That is a key difference in the data I've been throwing around.  The set of "snaps without Watson" cover all of weeks 1 through 7, but also varying amounts for the rest of the season.  The fairest comparison is looking at the snaps Kraft didn't play and see how much better they are with him vs. without within the same game.  To be clear, I would expect some kind of bump, he's a good player.And then the other part, which is why I keep harping on signing Kraft and Tucker--it could easily BE BOTH.  Watson having this impressive measured improvement to the offense doesn't mean Kraft doesn't have the same.  Losing Kraft and seeing total points go down doesn't mean it would have been even worse without Watson.I keep asking for someone to find the equivalent metrics for Kraft because no matter they show, they will be interesting and paint a more accurate picture.  I want them, but I don't have the time to go get them myself.  And I don't know if I have the right access to get that breakdown.</blockquote>

Total: 1,126 (members: 1, guests: 1,125)