Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Trade Theory
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Heyjoe4" data-source="post: 967534" data-attributes="member: 13032"><p>Trading two second rounders to get Watson wasn't a huge stretch. I think using Jimmy Johnson's system the trade was worth a very late first rounder. They took Watson very early in round two. And whether it was need, or BPA, Gluten made the right picks in rounds 1 and 2.</p><p></p><p>Overall though I do agree that most GMs say they take the BPA, and then draft for need. But usually the players involved are all close together, so it's hard to prove or disprove. An example might be the years the Packers tried and tried in the first and second rounds to find a CB. There had to be a WR close in talent. They never took the WR, never found their CB either (well, until Gluten drafted Alexander). The need for a CB was greater than the need for a WR. I'm ok with that, but then use a first rounder on a corner and a second rounder on a WR. Didn't happen and this year is gonna be rough because of it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Heyjoe4, post: 967534, member: 13032"] Trading two second rounders to get Watson wasn't a huge stretch. I think using Jimmy Johnson's system the trade was worth a very late first rounder. They took Watson very early in round two. And whether it was need, or BPA, Gluten made the right picks in rounds 1 and 2. Overall though I do agree that most GMs say they take the BPA, and then draft for need. But usually the players involved are all close together, so it's hard to prove or disprove. An example might be the years the Packers tried and tried in the first and second rounds to find a CB. There had to be a WR close in talent. They never took the WR, never found their CB either (well, until Gluten drafted Alexander). The need for a CB was greater than the need for a WR. I'm ok with that, but then use a first rounder on a corner and a second rounder on a WR. Didn't happen and this year is gonna be rough because of it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Staff online
PikeBadger
Moderator
Members online
gopkrs
Packer Fan in SD
Pkrjones
Schultz
sschind
DABIGZ
AKCheese
PackerDNA
Firethorn1001
PackerinSD
yxz1000r
gatorpack
shockerx
tynimiller
ExpatPacker
GreenBaySlacker
RepStar15
childerm
Half Empty
mradtke66
PikeBadger
Azpackfan4
XPack
Big L
weeds
Team Ronny
Catamount1971
Latest posts
P
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: PackerDNA
A moment ago
Draft Talk
2024 1st Rd pick #25 Jorden Morgan OL
Latest: tynimiller
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #45 Edgerrin Cooper LB
Latest: tynimiller
2 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
C
I had This Nightmare
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Today at 5:38 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
H
2024 Draft Prospect Discussions
Latest: Heyjoe4
Today at 3:57 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Trade Theory
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top