Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Pokerbrat2000" data-source="post: 732406" data-attributes="member: 7261">I think its pretty obvious that either Hill or Callahan will be our #3 and the other guy most likely will not be a Packer, no need to carry 4 QB's on the roster and PS.  I also hope that whoever it is, we are able to stash him on the PS and not use a roster spot.  Maybe cut both and sign whoever is not picked up or the best one if they both are still available?These next 2 games (especially the final one) will determine who that guy is and possibly, who our #2 QB is when Hundley is out of GB.  I like Callahan, but there is something that intrigues me about Hill and his athleticism.  I don't think Hill being 25 is a negative, it actually might even be a positive.  However, his injury history as well as being in the Packer system for only 1 camp, might be his downfall.The move that would surprise a lot of people is either Hill or Callahan really show something special in the next 2 games and the Packers find a trade partner for Hundley and one of them becomes our #2.  I don't see that happening, Hundley right now is much better than either of them and having him for insurance is far more valuable than a future draft pick.  Now if the trade was for a player that could instantly benefit the Packers AND Hill or Callahan show they could be a #2.......then it would get interesting.</blockquote>

Total: 631 (members: 1, guests: 630)