Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="RRyder" data-source="post: 769524" data-attributes="member: 10329">Yeah because there's no way you could slide HHCD to SS, a position he's probably better suited for, in order to bring in arguably the best Saftey in the game to a defense that has been the Achilles heel and is in desperate need of playmakers in the secondary.Let's bring in a guy to a offense that will be a top 10 offense without him and who will cost more to acquire, more to retain and get to share targets with two other players that just signed huge deals and will need the ball to along with a couple emerging RBs. All with the added bonus of now having 45 million locked into 3 receiving targetsIf you actually think adding OBJ impact on this team is greater then adding Earl Thomas then there's really just no point in responding any more.The fact you tried bringing up "value" between the two, when talking about which would be better for the Packers to acquire, is just silly. You can love OBJ but if you can still actually look at the two players intelligently you'd understand one player present a huge upgrade to a unit that desperatey needs it were as bringing in the other comes with diminishing returns regardless of how great he is.</blockquote>

Total: 951 (members: 3, guests: 948)