Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 884958" data-attributes="member: 12283">That’s true for some guys on that list, like Mike Williams or Michael Gallup. Which would mean that the Packers would have to pay up in terms of draft pick compensation. That’s not something I expect, but I listed them as guys that could potentially move if their current team doesn’t plan to resign them. Other, lesser players on that list on rookie deals would be less likely to bring a good comp pick. And of course, getting one in the first place would depend on what else that team plans to do in FA. But I would agree that a veteran is more likely to be moved than a player on a rookie deal, and there are some veterans on that list. I think virtually all Packer fans agree that the WR corps could stand to improve. And certainly in its weakened state of two weeks ago it is an issue. It might prove to be an issue against tougher defenses even when healthy. We will see. But what’s also true is that certain posters have been darn near rooting for the offense to flop just so that all their hand wringing over the position is validated. Which is funny, in a pathetic kind of way.</blockquote>

Total: 665 (members: 2, guests: 663)