Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Trade Deadline Targets
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dantés" data-source="post: 884856" data-attributes="member: 12283"><p>Nothing about the Jones idea makes sense.</p><p></p><p>1) He’s aging. He turns 32 the day after the SB.</p><p></p><p>2) He’s dealing with nagging injuries, and increasingly so as he gets older.</p><p></p><p>3) He’s expensive and the Packers have cap issues enough already.</p><p></p><p>4) The Packers need at WR is not for a #1; they have Adams, who is 4 years younger (and himself needs an extension after 2021 if he’s to stick around). Their WR corps is lacking experienced complementary pieces.</p><p></p><p>5) This offense is not reliant on having a super deep depth chart of great wide receivers. The roster and their odds at winning this year would be better served with an acquisition on defense.</p><p></p><p>6) The offense has been the best in the NFL despite missing lots of snaps from guys already in the WR corps.</p><p></p><p>Speaking of dogs and bones, it seems that some people are going to persist that our wide receivers are a debilitating weakness regardless of what happens on the field.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dantés, post: 884856, member: 12283"] Nothing about the Jones idea makes sense. 1) He’s aging. He turns 32 the day after the SB. 2) He’s dealing with nagging injuries, and increasingly so as he gets older. 3) He’s expensive and the Packers have cap issues enough already. 4) The Packers need at WR is not for a #1; they have Adams, who is 4 years younger (and himself needs an extension after 2021 if he’s to stick around). Their WR corps is lacking experienced complementary pieces. 5) This offense is not reliant on having a super deep depth chart of great wide receivers. The roster and their odds at winning this year would be better served with an acquisition on defense. 6) The offense has been the best in the NFL despite missing lots of snaps from guys already in the WR corps. Speaking of dogs and bones, it seems that some people are going to persist that our wide receivers are a debilitating weakness regardless of what happens on the field. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
No members online now.
Latest posts
2026 Roster Thread - Semi-Live
Latest: DoURant
Today at 4:49 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Why I Love The 2026-2027 Green Bay Packers
Latest: milani
Today at 3:28 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Valuation of NFL Teams
Latest: milani
Today at 3:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
F
Christian Watson signs a 4 year 110m extension
Latest: Firethorn1001
Today at 1:20 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
R
Cam Achord new ST coach - Fire him
Latest: rmontro
Today at 11:53 AM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Trade Deadline Targets
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top