Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
To those who oppose a Release
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="porky88" data-source="post: 234134" data-attributes="member: 489"><p>This idea that they should release him because they're going with Rodgers is just ridiculous in my opinion.</p><p></p><p>Of course the best thing to do is bring Favre back but the ship has now sailed. Let's say taking Rodgers over Favre is a horrible move. It might be and it might workout but let's say it is.</p><p></p><p>You can't continue to make one poor decision after another. That's the answer.</p><p></p><p>Releasing Favre would be a horrible decision.</p><p></p><p>Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy have never criticize Favre's ability to continue to play the game. They constantly say they'll do what's best for the Green Bay Packers. </p><p></p><p>Well that would be to get something for him. It's pretty obvious. Trade is the best for the Packers considering the circumstance the Packers have put themselves in and for Brett Favre considering the circumstance Brett Favre has put himself in.</p><p></p><p>Certain players have the ability to beat certain teams. Brett Favre is one of those players. The Packers realize that and that's why they won't move on without him. They've moved on but that doesn't mean they've moved on to the point that they'll tell themselves Favre isn't a great QB. They know he is and that's why they'll trade him to get something for him. It's what's best for the franchise. Nobody can honestly say releasing Brett Favre and having him go to Minnesota is what's best for the Green Bay Packers or their fans. </p><p></p><p>Here's a quote from Brad Childress</p><p></p><p><em>"You can make an argument for one side and an argument for another," Childress said of the hypothetical prospect of bringing a 38-year-old star quarterback into the mix. "But I can't waste a lot of energy. All I can do is take a look at the waivers every day and see if there's somebody that's better than somebody on the roster. That's really all you can evaluate."</em></p><p></p><p>Sounds like he's not closing the door on Favre if he had the chance.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="porky88, post: 234134, member: 489"] This idea that they should release him because they're going with Rodgers is just ridiculous in my opinion. Of course the best thing to do is bring Favre back but the ship has now sailed. Let's say taking Rodgers over Favre is a horrible move. It might be and it might workout but let's say it is. You can't continue to make one poor decision after another. That's the answer. Releasing Favre would be a horrible decision. Ted Thompson and Mike McCarthy have never criticize Favre's ability to continue to play the game. They constantly say they'll do what's best for the Green Bay Packers. Well that would be to get something for him. It's pretty obvious. Trade is the best for the Packers considering the circumstance the Packers have put themselves in and for Brett Favre considering the circumstance Brett Favre has put himself in. Certain players have the ability to beat certain teams. Brett Favre is one of those players. The Packers realize that and that's why they won't move on without him. They've moved on but that doesn't mean they've moved on to the point that they'll tell themselves Favre isn't a great QB. They know he is and that's why they'll trade him to get something for him. It's what's best for the franchise. Nobody can honestly say releasing Brett Favre and having him go to Minnesota is what's best for the Green Bay Packers or their fans. Here's a quote from Brad Childress [i]"You can make an argument for one side and an argument for another," Childress said of the hypothetical prospect of bringing a 38-year-old star quarterback into the mix. "But I can't waste a lot of energy. All I can do is take a look at the waivers every day and see if there's somebody that's better than somebody on the roster. That's really all you can evaluate."[/i] Sounds like he's not closing the door on Favre if he had the chance. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
shockerx
PackerDNA
Latest posts
I’ve been absent sort of but now I’m back
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 11:22 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
NFC North Predictions
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 11:18 PM
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
S
State of our former QB, Aaron Rodgers
Latest: saturdaysarebetter
Yesterday at 11:15 PM
Aaron Rodgers Discusson
NFC North Draft Review (2025)
Latest: Calebs Revenge
Yesterday at 11:03 PM
Draft Talk
First Round Pick #23 - Matthew Golden WR - Texas
Latest: OldSchool101
Yesterday at 3:46 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
To those who oppose a Release
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top
