Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mondio" data-source="post: 895723" data-attributes="member: 10441">I don't think he was saying that, rather saying it HAS been talked about ad nauseam on this board since that day, and I'd agree with him.  You can't see an incomplete pass by Rodgers in any given game and not have any 1 of 4 posters going off about King and Watt.  It's been that ridiculous over the years.  a few bad plays be defense, King/Watt.  Defense gives up a first down, King/Watt.  packers give up the first first down of the game, King/Watt explodes in the chat room.  so, any new information on King/Watt that hasn't been discussed 4,567 times since just August of this year?  Go ahead, start a thread if not, is it really necessary?  anyway, since we have the thread, about the time he inks a huge deal you'll see the frame can't handle the strength type injuries that plagued his brother start getting the younger Watt too.  At least King was inexpensive while he was injured <img src="/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/smile.png"  class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)" data-shortname=":)" /> that's my prediction.  But yes, it's fairly obvious at that up to this point, one was definitely the more productive pick.</blockquote>

No members online now.

Total: 1,079 (members: 0, guests: 1,079)