Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Tight End play is anything but tight…
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bruce" data-source="post: 132909" data-attributes="member: 196"><p>Why would you be sorry?</p><p></p><p>I certainly agree with your attachment theory, but think it must be tempered with building a team where players and coaches trust each other.</p><p></p><p>Frankly (no pun intended), TT seems more attached to the idea of Franks being OK and nothing that can't be resolved.</p><p></p><p>MM seems more detached and setting clearer expectations of what he expects from Bubba if he comes back.</p><p></p><p>I wrote an evaluation piece -- where I wrote it the way I see it. I have no attachment to Franks and think it could go either way.</p><p></p><p>I do think the Packers need to consider TE a primary need position, along with RB, S and CB. Secondary needs are OL, WR and DE. Of course all of that changes if Brett retires.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bruce, post: 132909, member: 196"] Why would you be sorry? I certainly agree with your attachment theory, but think it must be tempered with building a team where players and coaches trust each other. Frankly (no pun intended), TT seems more attached to the idea of Franks being OK and nothing that can't be resolved. MM seems more detached and setting clearer expectations of what he expects from Bubba if he comes back. I wrote an evaluation piece -- where I wrote it the way I see it. I have no attachment to Franks and think it could go either way. I do think the Packers need to consider TE a primary need position, along with RB, S and CB. Secondary needs are OL, WR and DE. Of course all of that changes if Brett retires. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Members online
Green_Bay_Packers
shockerx
Packermudgeon
kf323
Team Ronny
weeds
Latest posts
2024 Round 7, pick 245: Michael Pratt, QB
Latest: Thirteen Below
21 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
2024 2nd Rd pick #58 Javon Bullard S
Latest: Thirteen Below
25 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Not too soon 2024 roster prediction
Latest: Sanguine camper
53 minutes ago
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Assessing the Draft Class (2024)
Latest: Dantés
Today at 2:48 PM
Draft Talk
2024 draft discussion thread
Latest: Pokerbrat2000
Today at 1:57 PM
Draft Talk
Forums
Open Football Discussion
Green Bay Packers Fan Forum
Tight End play is anything but tight…
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top